?

Log in

Catherine [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Catherine

[ website | Stories Under Paris ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Stories and hair, and a book or two [Mar. 26th, 2017|07:08 pm]
Catherine
[mood |cheerfulcheerful]

Oh, thank goodness, I managed to write another story.

I know that sounds a little excessively relieved, but there's nothing like going through a four-week dry patch where you can't seem to finish everything and every word you write is dull and derivative and like writing through glue to make you wonder if you've just run out of stories...

Anyway, it's for Boissière, and it's called The Last Wish, and it's about that woman who got a sausage stuck to her nose in Perrault.  Who is, incidentally, infuriatingly chauvinistic at every opportunity.  Consider, for example, this gem:

“Fanny’s mind was soon made up: although she had dreamt of a crown and sceptre, yet a woman’s first wish is always to please. To this great desire all else must yield, and Fanny would rather be fair in drugget than be a Queen with an ugly face.”

ORLY?

(and I'm not talking about the airport in Paris, either).

Three guesses what decision my heroine made...

Life without hairCollapse )

I've been reading some good books recently, and I keep forgetting to mention them here, but I need to draw your attention to two extremely fun romances by Lucy Parker - Act Like It and Pretty Face.  They are both set in the London West End and in and around theatre companies and productions, and they are absolutely marvellous.  They remind me strongly of old musicals like Singing in the Rain, or maybe of the better bits of Much Ado About Nothing - the banter between hero and heroine is just fabulous, there is a lot of self-awareness (particularly with regard to power differentials), and one feels at all times that hero and heroine are a match for each other.  Another nice aspect of it is that Parker uses the intensity of tabloid coverage and the importance of professional reputation in ways that parallel the kinds of dilemmas faced by characters in historicals, which is a very neat trick
.  I think these will become some of my favourite sad day books - I just find myself smiling in delight and laughing all the way through them.

I'm also really enjoying Alison Stuart's English Civil War-set romances, which are nicely meaty and remind me of Rosemary Sutcliffe or DK Broster, but with romance. 

I know there was more I wanted to write, but that will do for now.  I have dinner to finish organising and Bach to practice.

What have you been reading recently?

(I can't tell you how relieved I am that I can write again, though.)

This entry was originally posted at http://17catherines.dreamwidth.org/1043701.html, where there are currently comment count unavailable comments. If you are feeling chatty, please pop along over and comment there using OpenID.
link

How not to deliver flowers [Mar. 21st, 2017|05:01 pm]
Catherine
[mood |tiredtired]

One of my postdocs is in hospital for a minor operation, and SoccerProfessor asked me to send her flowers.  She is, apparently, at St Vincent's, so I picked a suitable florist and a pretty arrangement, and arranged the floral offering.

At 4:20 pm, I get a call from the florist.  There is nobody of that name at St Vincent's Hospital.  Might she be under another name?

Said postdoc is married, so after some consultation with SoccerProfessor, we unearthed her husband's name.  And also postdoc's phone number, because we figured that she is just out of surgery, her husband will answer, it will all be good.

At 4:30 pm I get a call from the florist.  Postdoc answered her own phone in a somewhat groggy state (scientists, what can you do) and confirmed that she was in hospital under the husband's name.  But St Vincent's is apparently very convinced that she isn't there.  And the florist really doesn't want to ring and disturb her again.  Are we sure she is at this campus?

We are not sure.  We are not sure at all.  After some consultation, we unearth the phone number of the husband.  Florist goes to ring the husband.

At 4:45 pm, I get a call from the florist.  By this time, I recognise the number and am feeling trepidacious.  Florist informs me that postdoc is indeed not at this campus.  This is because Postdoc is at the Epworth.  Which is not St Vincent's, or any campus thereof.  Thank you, SoccerProfessor! 

Florist is very friendly and helpful and courier is happy to deliver to the Epworth.  Assuming she is at the nearby Epworth.  Because, you see, the Epworth has 12 campuses, and the husband didn't mention which campus postdoc was at.  And some of those campuses are outside the delivery range.  And the florist, helpful though she is, really doesn't want to bother poor Postdoc or her husband again.

Do I happen to know...?

I do not.  In fact, I've got nothing.

Florist suggests that they give the nearest campus a try and hope for the best.  Florist promises to ring me and let me know, either way.  She warns me that if it's the wrong campus, we may have to rethink our whole strategy.

At 5:00pm, I get a call from the florist.  "Hi Georgie!" I say enthusiastically, because by this time we are almost like old friends.  Georgie laughs *far more hysterically than this warrants* which is alarming in and of itself.  I brace myself for the worst.

But no - Postdoc has been successfully located at the Epworth!  Flowers will be delivered!  No extra charge will be applied!  Everything is fine and everyone can go home with a sense of satisfaction at a job well done.

I just hope Postdoc likes the flowers.



In other news, I shaved my head today, to raise money for the Leukaemia Foundation.  I think I've really badgered enough people for sponsorship, but I'll just do one last little badger (mushroom! mushroom!) - if you would like to sponsor me, my page is here.  There is even photographic evidence of my shaved head!  To my surprise and relief, I still look like me, and far less ugly than I feared.  From the photo angle, I actually look quite good (I'm less convinced of the profile view).  And given the horribly humid, hot weather we've been having recently, it's very nice not to have hair sitting on the back of my neck.
This entry was originally posted at http://17catherines.dreamwidth.org/1043238.html, where there are currently comment count unavailable comments. If you are feeling chatty, please pop along over and comment there using OpenID.
link

Oh, NHMRC [Mar. 10th, 2017|08:57 am]
Catherine
Here is the procedure for deleting one (1) Chief Investigator from your grant:

1. Click on the grant in your list of grants
2. Once in the grant, go to the 'Research Team' page.
3. On the Research Team page, click on the CI you want to delete
4. On the CI's page, find the sub menu called 'Cancel Nomination'.
5. On 'Cancel Nomination', click yes.
6. Save.
7. Return to the Research Team page.
8. Click on the box next to the CI's name, and select 'Delete'.
9. On the page which comes up, confirm that yes, you really want to delete this person.  (Or not.  This page often fails to load, and you have to return to step 7 and do it all again)
10. Oh, thank goodness.  They are finally gone.

Here is the procedure for DELETING THE ENTIRE BLOODY GRANT IN ONE FELL SWOOP.

1. Click on the grant in your list of grants
2. Once in the grant, on the very front page of the grant, click 'Yes' next to the ticky box called 'Mark grant for deletion'.
3. Save.
4. Experience heart failure as you find yourself back on the list of grants, with the grant you just marked for deletion now gone without a trace, and also without so much as a screen asking you to check whether you are sure you deleted the right grant...

It was, in fact the right grant.  But I do feel that the respective difficulty levels of these two items might, in a saner world, be reversed...

This entry was originally posted at http://17catherines.dreamwidth.org/1042759.html, where there are currently comment count unavailable comments. If you are feeling chatty, please pop along over and comment there using OpenID.
link

Writing and Ash Wednesday thoughts [Mar. 1st, 2017|08:15 pm]
Catherine
[mood |tiredtired]

I'm working on a longer post about the Australian Romance Readers' Convention which I attended last weekend and which was absolutely fantastic, but it's taking too long to write and goodness knows when I'll get back on Dreamwidth, given that Grants are in full swing.  We got the LLS monster grant in yesterday, which is something, but Project Grants are running massively behind, and I'm expecting that the next two weeks will be a new kind of hell.

Also, I've had a cold since Friday, and can't really take time off due to the aforementioned Grants Madness.  I suspect it's a work cold anyway.  When I went looking for signatures on Monday, I could hear coughing and sneezing everywhere I went...

The points system has fallen by the wayside because I'm just too overwhelmed right now, and haven't had time/energy to make lunches on the weekends.  I hope to return to form next week.  I did manage some political action last week - I filled in this survey about the new bylaws which essentially ban homelessness in the CBD (without actually fixing the underlying problems that lead to it).

I did manage to write a story, too, though I'm not sure it's one of my better ones.  It's called 'Home To Roost', for Mairie d'Issy station, and it is the second story of the LeBruns. I spent way too much time trying to decipher French council regulations about animals in order to see if there were any rulings about chickens for this story...

Today was Ash Wednesday, which I marked, as I usually do, with a visit to St Mary's North Melbourne before work for the Imposition of Ashes and Holy Communion.  It was a lovely service, as it always is.  I like their priest, and I get a real sense of peace from the services there.  Which puts me in a quandary, actually.  I've been singing at Wesley for over a decade, and that's kind of my church community, and I really love Alistair's sermons. I've been thinking of actually becoming a proper member of the church, partly because I want to make sure I keep my ties to it now that I'm no longer singing with the choir.  But today's service really reminded me of why I still think of myself as an Anglican.  I can't express how much I like and respect Alistair - he's one of those people who really makes me think that I want to be Christian like *that* - but there is something in the ritual and the space of an Anglican Church that speaks to me on a level that the Wesley services don't.  I learn a lot at Wesley, and the music is great, but I don't feel close to God there, any more than anywhere else.  (Of course, this might also be because I've always had a role at Wesley where I had to be 'on' professionally, in a sense, whereas at St Mary's, I can just be in the moment.  So that should be considered, too.) 

To an extent, one has to choose, because there are only so many places one can be simultaneously on a Sunday morning...

Also, it would be nice if I could fall in love with a church that was actually in walking distance from my home.  Wesley eats half the day when I go there...

Anyway.  Welcome to Lent.  We're vegetarian again for the duration, and I'm trying to stick to my two disciplines of not buying anything that I do not absolutely need and of reading a chapter or two of the (rather choppy, but very academic) translation I have of the New Testament every morning and evening.  I do love this time in the church calendar.

And here comes the headache and snuffliness again.  Goodnight!

This entry was originally posted at http://17catherines.dreamwidth.org/1042507.html, where there are currently comment count unavailable comments. If you are feeling chatty, please pop along over and comment there using OpenID.
link

I think I need another weekend... [Feb. 19th, 2017|06:16 pm]
Catherine
I seem to have spent this one in lots of very taxing conversations, one way or another.  Too many people I love are going through awful things.  And I want to be present, and to help, and to listen, especially when it's the first time someone has started talking to me about something which is important and difficult for them.  It's just a bit tricky when one gets a bunch of these in a row right after wasting a lot of intellectual and emotional energy on an argument that I should have recognised earlier would go nowhere.  Though that would have meant going into it with – as it transpires – as poor an opinion of the person I was arguing with as he evidently had of me.

Anyway, I'm quite tired now, and headachey, and a little depressed.  And I still need to sort out lunches for the week.  And dinner, though this is looking increasingly like fish and chips.

Also, today's sermon was amusingly on-point for me (alas!).  The minister was talking about Jesus's instruction to turn the other cheek, and particularly framing it as being about stepping back from an argument, rather than letting it devolve into a tit-for-tat situation that has no end.  Um, yes, letting go of arguments is not my best skill.

Though I did like the bit where he was introducing the theme to the children, by getting one of the little girls to slap his hand, and then he slapped her hand back, very gently, so she slapped his again, and they continued like this for a few rounds, and he said 'what do you think would happen if you didn't slap me this time?' and held out his hand, and a little boy immediately ran up and slapped it!  I don't think this was quite the lesson he was trying to illustrate...

This entry was originally posted at http://17catherines.dreamwidth.org/1042332.html, where there are currently comment count unavailable comments. If you are feeling chatty, please pop along over and comment there using OpenID.
link

Oh, scientists (Grants edition) [Feb. 18th, 2017|11:05 pm]
Catherine
The Early Career Fellowships are always fun, because they are written by baby scientists who don't know what they are doing but think they do.  Given that the NHMRC's Grant Management System (RGMS) is particularly opaque and tends to hide away entire compulsory sections, my approach tends to be to try to grab my ECF babies early, and make them sit down with me while we go through setting up a CV and a Grant on RGMS together.  That way, I can show them the bugs and the usual hiding spots and be pretty confident that I'm not going to get a last minute panic as someone discovers that they missed a whole section of the grant they didn't know about.

I had two ECFs this year, one of whom needed hardly any hand-holding at all.  And they were due to our grants office two weeks ago, and have an external deadline of March 1, so I thought I was done with them, and had moved on to reading CDFs and Projects.

And then SoccerProfessor forwarded me an email in which he told a baby postdoc who is in the US that of course she can apply for an ECF through his Division.

So I spent most of Wednesday and Thursday conferring with the Grants Office (who were understandably irritated about the whole thing), and then trying to talk a baby scientist in a different time zone through the intricacies of RGMS, with lots of screencaps, including helping her find the hidden sections, explaining why exactly she could not write some of the things she wanted to write, and pointing out that Times New Roman 10 is not an acceptable font when the Instructions say 12 point. The awful thing is that I have a terrible suspicion that she is going to be ruled ineligible anyway, but the Grants Office seemed to think she was OK, so hopefully I'm wrong.

It certainly added a special something to my week.

On Wednesday, I also had the hard drive on my computer replaced.  My computer celebrated this by failing to start on Thursday morning for ten minutes, and then proving to have lost all my carefully hand-made Endnote styles.  And possibly other things, but the search function is so borked that it's hard to tell.  I'm just hoping it doesn't die before I can get my new one.  It's still randomly turning Greek letters into little icons of people, flies and animals.  The IT helpdesk told me that a) I shouldn't be using Symbol to insert Greek characters, and nor should any of the scientists and b) I shouldn't be using Microsoft Word because it's terrible.  And it is terrible, but since I don't have a lot of choice about this, it would be nice if you supported it...

In non-aggravating-computer news, Bach choir is still highly enjoyable, and I've read a bunch of pleasantly light contemporary romances by Madeline Ash this week, ahead of the Australian Romance Readers Association conference next weekend.  I've also done a big re-read of Amy Raby's Hearts and Thrones novels, which are romances in a fantasy setting that is rather a lot like Ancient Rome, with some fairly intense politics, and assassins, spies and kings who do not hesitate to act as assassins, spies and kings, which is refreshing.  (That is to say, I like a good spies and assassins sort of plot as much as the next person, but it gets a little aggravating when they are all super ethical and never have to make any hard choices...)

I haven't written a lot this week, and my political engagement was solely a donation to the Asylum Seeker Resource Centre. I've been under the weather with bad period pain for most of the week, and now have the lingering post-hormone headache, which is not conducive to writing.  But, as I think I mentioned previously, I did get to attend most of the Symposium on BH3 mimetics and Venetoclax / Venclaxta at work on Monday, which was fun - my scientists made the initial discovery of the role of Bcl-2 back in 1987, and have been working on the Bcl-2 family of proteins from different angles ever since, and we are finally at the point where these discoveries are turning into drugs which are proving very effective in the clinic, specifically to cure relapsed/refractory leukaemias.  And it looks to me like the sort of tipping point where we're going to get a bunch of these BH3 mimetics and SMAC mimetics and similar therapies out in quite a short space of time, which is very exciting!  So the symposium kind of retraced the history of this work and then looked at what other things we have which are in clinical trials or about to be, and it was all very positive and fun, and I got to see lots of my scientists being clever, which is always nice. 

Hopefully I'll write something useful tomorrow.  But it turns out I can't stay awake any longer, so goodnight...

This entry was originally posted at http://17catherines.dreamwidth.org/1041981.html, where there are currently comment count unavailable comments. If you are feeling chatty, please pop along over and comment there using OpenID.
link

Bright spots on a pain day [Feb. 13th, 2017|04:03 pm]
Catherine
[mood |soresore]

I love it that my period now comes with a side serve of generalised inflammation, such that every joint or tendon I've ever injured or over-used - which is basically all of them - gets swollen and sore.  There is virtually no part of me that does not currently hurt.

But...

Today's salad lunch was actually really good, so that's nice.

I have chocolate brownies in the house, also a banana cake that is alarmingly Country Women's Association in its evenness of texture and perfectly flat top and tidy icing.  For a cake that mostly happened because I had totally forgotten about those bananas for two weeks (and then nearly didn't happen because one of the three had actually gone mouldy), it's surprisingly good.

And I actually had time to attend most of the symposium today, which was very interesting, since it was one half talks about new possible BH3 and SMAC mimetics, and the other half the 30 year history of apoptosis and how it led to the development of venetoclax.  Fascinating hearing how things got started, especially as it was mostly my scientists who founded the field. 

Also, I wound up sitting between my two most tall, dark and handsome lab heads during the first half of the day, which was very pleasing, especially as they were making amusingly sardonic remarks on the talks.

(I would not normally be commenting on the extreme gorgeousness of these two lab heads, except that a) they really are very gorgeous, it's quite distracting if one is tired and distractible, and b) I really was feeling terrible this morning, and had a lot of trouble dragging myself to work, and I choose to view this as my reward for being a good Catherine and not staying at home in bed.)

And, as I think I've mentioned, I've started reading novels by the various authors I'll be meeting at the ARRA festival in a couple of weeks.  This morning's novella was quite adorable, and today's novel is looking promising, which is good, because the one I was reading over the weekend was pretty dire and I have no idea what I'm going to say in my five-minute face to face session.  I think the plot was quite good?  But I wanted to slap the hero almost all the time, and the author had a bad habit of drawing out characters' reactions to everything in a way that slowed down the plot to a crawl.  I'm sort of wishing I hadn't read it, actually – it would be easier to be enthusiastic about it in theory.

And we got our first Marley Spoon delivery, and the ingredients certainly look nice, though there are more peas than Andrew is likely to appreciate.

For a pain day, it could be much worse. 

But it would be even nicer if it were not a pain day.

This entry was originally posted at http://17catherines.dreamwidth.org/1041838.html, where there are currently comment count unavailable comments. If you are feeling chatty, please pop along over and comment there using OpenID.
link

Scientists, Stories and Surprise Serial Killers [Feb. 11th, 2017|10:37 am]
Catherine
[mood |amusedamused]

We're well into February now, which means it's Grant Season at work.  This particular season is looking suspiciously light, if one does not count the massive LLS SCOR (for which, fortunately, I have help – we hired someone to coordinate it.  Having said that, the administrative burden for this grant is high enough that when the NHMRC load is down, I'm now helping my helper).  But I'm now in that lovely time of year when I get to read people's grants and giggle at their phrasing. 

Some of my favourites from this week include the chap who was talking about the Institutional Support provided and listed 'personal support' as one of the supports provided.  I suggested that he might possibly mean mentoring, though I understood how the stresses of grant season might take one that way.  He also finished this section with a flourish '... which will enable me to succeed in my scientific quests.'  Nice.

I also have one woman who wanted to talk about the ascension of her career trajectory, which is a nice attempt to re-phrase the endless 'upward trajectory' fellowship applicants have to demonstrate, but had some interesting theological implications.

I had to gently suggest to a couple more people that, in a world where reviewers work at other research Institutes and Universities, one should perhaps exercise a little modesty and not say that our Institute is 'the leading Institute in Australia' (or indeed the world) for this sort of research.  We already have a reputation for being up ourselves; let's not give the reviewers an excuse to look at 'track record in relation to opportunity' and say 'well, clearly their opportunities are the best possible, why don't they have twelve Nature papers and four patents'?

My German speakers all want to say that they can guarantee excellent results from their experiments.  I'm beginning to think that this has something to do with how English is taught in German-speaking countries.

And the competition to find the best adjective with which to describe one's papers continues.  Seminal is always good.  Groundbreaking is nice.  Paradigm-shifting is excellent.  Revered, on the other hand, should perhaps be avoided.  Unless you are aiming for sarcastic marginalia, which I suspect some of my scientists are now doing, at least on occasion.

My political action for this week was ringing Turnbull's office and asking him to withdraw from the deal with Trump to send our refugees to America.  I think this article by Michelle Grattan (on whose sofa bed I once slept in London, she says, namedropping cheerfully), lays out the reasons why very well.  I also donated to a homelessness charity, because the Lord Mayor of Melbourne just criminalised sleeping rough in the city (because apparently if people aren't allowed to sleep on the streets, they will magically stop being homeless).  I'm contemplating a political post on the current war on poor people, and trying to work out who I can write to about what.

In other news, ALL my stories got stuck.  I started making inroads on my Pierrot Pantin sequence, and went looking for The Velveteen Rabbit, only I didn't remember that it was about a rabbit and so I started asking google for picture books featuring teddy bears.  This led me to a Goodreads list which started with Winnie the Pooh and Paddington, and then descended alarmingly to a book titled ...but Teddy, I'm SO HORNY (Stuffed by my Teddy Book 2), which is not a link you should click on at work, because the blurb is actually worse than even the title suggests.  Once I'd managed to bleach my brain clean of that, a friend helpfully pointed me at Mallory Ortberg's creepy retelling of the story, after which I thought I'd better write about something else, because I knew that was going to infect my writing style.

So instead, I started - and finished - a completely new story for Les Sablons called The Little Fox, which is a sequel of sorts to Antoine de Saint-Exupéry's The Little Prince.  And then I illustrated it with pencil drawings, which was fun, because I haven't really tried to draw anything properly since I was in early high school - our school made you choose between arty subjects and academic ones at the age of 13, and while I loved art, I wasn't good enough at it to convince my parents that I should do that instead of geography.  Which is sort of apt to the circumstances.  So I'm quite pleased with the way the drawings came out, all things considered – though it's fortunate that Antoine de Saint-Exupéry's style is itself rather childlike and simple.  And it was interesting how much better the story worked once the pictures were there - I really didn't expect that.

I can't actually remember what I've been reading this week.  Not a lot, I think.  Though I've started reading novels by the various authors I'll be meeting at the Australian Romance Readers Association conference in a couple of weeks.  The first one I read, by Maggie Mundy, had 100% more serial killers and angry ghosts than I had expected. 

Oh lord, and of course it did.  And I've just realised that this is the second romance novel I've read in the last year that had surprise serial killers in it, and they were both set in South Australia.  We always like to joke that Adelaide is the Serial Killer capital of the world, but I didn't expect romance authors to embrace this stereotype...

So that was my week.  What was yours like?

This entry was originally posted at http://17catherines.dreamwidth.org/1041592.html, where there are currently comment count unavailable comments. If you are feeling chatty, please pop along over and comment there using OpenID.
link

Rain, rain, rain! [Feb. 5th, 2017|06:45 pm]
Catherine
[mood |busybusy]

It has been a hot, sticky weekend but now it is raining.  I just went outside and stood in the rain doing minimalist yoga, just for the pure pleasure of getting wet and very slightly cold.  Well, cool.  Not really cold.

I'm still making salads for my lunches four days a week.  I feel as though this is eating my Sunday afternoons, so I may have to find a better way of organising this.  They are good salads, but somehow more time consuming than they should be.  But then, I've been feeling rather slow-motion on weekends, which might be the problem.  Not too many points this week, though - I squeaked up to 28, courtesy of yesterday's hot weather.  But then, I was rather sick on Wednesday, which prevented me from getting as many points as I would have liked.  I do wonder at what point I'll be able to climb up the four double-flights of stairs to my office without being puffed at the end... 

I'm considering getting the 'Habitica' app, which basically gamifies your to-do list by rewarding you for completing tasks, because I am getting very tired of salads for lunch, even if they are nice ones. 

In line with my decision to try to do One Thing per week in the political world, I rang three of politicians on my lunchbreak on Monday about refugee stuff, and also emailed my local MP again.  The chap at Dutton's office sounded like a bit of a prat, but was quite polite, which was interesting because I've been reading that people are getting rather rude treatment when they ring - I am inclined to think my upper-middle-class accent and posh phone manner may be helping there. Perhaps I sound like someone who might vote Liberal?  No particular joy from the three calls, but I did get a very long and quite personal/impassioned email from my local MP, Peter Khalil.  He's new to the job, and a former refugee himself, and feels *very strongly* about refugees and how we are treating them. 

The most interesting part of the email to me was the bit after the standard boilerplate about how obviously Labor's policy is better than the Coalition's, and here it is for my information, where he said straight out that while this *was* better than the Coalition's policy, it doesn't go anywhere near far enough, and we need to increase our intake, and take a leadership role in the region and stop doing terrible things to people on Nauru, and that he is going to lobby for this within the party.  I've never had an official letter from a politician that criticised his own Party before, and I'm quite impressed.  I also rather suspect that he wrote this email himself – I don't think it's a unique email just for me, and I imagine it's a form letter to anyone writing about refugees – but I'm pretty sure it's a form letter he wrote.  It had that slightly awkward English that is not ungrammatical or wrong precisely, but which is the hallmark of someone who doesn't do a lot of writing for a living.  No professional communications person writes like that - it was more like an email from one of my scientists who has English as a first language, but doesn't really take joy in it, if you know what I mean. 

Anyway, I was fairly impressed, and he may even be getting my vote come the next Federal Election. Whenever that is.  My money is still on 'in less than one term'.  And I expect we will have at least one more Prime Minister between now and then.

I had my first practice with the Melbourne Bach Choir this Thursday.  We'll be doing the Saint John Passion on Good Friday at the Recital Centre, which should be a lot of fun.  It's strange singing in such a huge choir after so many years in tiny ones - there must be at least forty altos, and as many sopranos, and while we have fewer men, I'd be surprised if the choir wasn't more than 100 people.  I'm liking the conductor a lot, too, and I think I'm going to learn a lot from him about conducting community choirs, as well as just different ways of teaching particular concepts.  The choir is an audition choir, but not everyone can sight-read, so we tend to go through individual lines more than I'm used to.  On the other hand, there is an expectation that people *will* practice at home, and there is a strong sense of focus - sections improve pretty fast.  I'm highly amused by his insistence on running everything at full speed once through the first time we sing it.  Given that Bach has some very fast and convoluted choruses, this is a recipe for madness. The goal is to stay together, even if most of the notes are wrong.  Which they mostly are...  

Interestingly (and a little sadly), I'm finding it very relaxing to sing with this group.  I hadn't realised how tense I was during choir practices at Wesley until I finished this one and realised I wasn't tense.  It's not about the music, either.  I think there was a certain amount of politics (inevitable in a small church choir), and a certain amount of personality conflict, and there were particular things I was finding frustrating which seemed to be unfixable.  Which is interesting, because I also have very good friends in that choir, and know nobody in the Bach choir.  So this might be a good break for me on a few levels. 

(I am sure the Bach choir has its politics, but I suspect the sheer size of the group make politics a bit easier to stay out of...)

In writing news, there should have been a new story this weekend, but there isn't, because I am now stuck in the middle of four separate stories and can't find my way out.  This is disheartening.  I can't get my fiction-writing brain to function properly at all just now. 

In reading news, I've just finished The Hanging Tree, by Ben Aaronovich, which is the most recent of the Rivers of London books.  I almost gave up on Aaronovich after the last few books, because I was so very cross about what he was doing with Lesley, but I really enjoyed this one, especially Guleeb, who I hope we will see more of.  I also devoured the new Eloisa James novel, Seven Minutes in Heaven, which was fluff, but enjoyable fluff, and has made me realise that I need to go back and read her Desperate Duchesses books again. 

And none of this is writing a story, is it?  But frankly, all I actually want to do now is sleep...
This entry was originally posted at http://17catherines.dreamwidth.org/1041333.html, where there are currently comment count unavailable comments. If you are feeling chatty, please pop along over and comment there using OpenID.
link

The English Language, and blog posts [Jan. 30th, 2017|12:20 pm]
Catherine
[mood |tiredtired]

My Brazilian postdoc is deeply and personally offended by the Oxford comma.

Her English is not perfect, but she has the 'no comma at the end of a list before an and' rule down, and now the journal has sent back her article to proof and has filled it with Oxford commas. 

She came to me to ask if this was, in fact, allowed.  I confessed that it was.  And that what she had been taught was also correct.

She is not satisfied with this explanation, and I do not blame her, but at least she is no longer painstakingly removing all the commas that the editor had so painstakingly put in. 

English really is a beast at times.

In other news, I wrote a politics post yesterday.  It wasn't the one I had been expecting to write, but it's one about imperfect activism and doing what you can, even if it isn't everything you would like to be doing.  I think it's useful, at least for me.  I've been spending far too much of my time feeling overwhelmed and vaguely guilty and after a while this gets in the way of actually getting anything productive done.

And if you are Australian, here is an excellent post, not by me, on effective activism in Australia.  (If you are interested in Australian pop culture, science fiction, racism, and birds, I highly recommend this blog in general.  It's always thought provoking, and occasionally brilliant.

That's about it for now.

This entry was originally posted at http://17catherines.dreamwidth.org/1040944.html, where there are currently comment count unavailable comments. If you are feeling chatty, please pop along over and comment there using OpenID.
link

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]